Comparison of IQ between 4-16 year-old children after cochlear implantation in the left or right ear


Navid Nourizadeh , Sharifeh Haghjoo , Mehran Beiraghi Tousi , Mohsen Rejatihaghi , Mehdi Ghasemi , Yalda Ravanshad , Mohammad Reza Tale


Abstract

Purpose: Hemispheric dominance is associated with more activity in one half of the body, which is very important in the presence of a relationship between the intelligence and brain lateralization. Delayed language development in the children undergoing cochlear implantation can have deleterious effects on their growth, academic performance, adaptation, and social interactions. Regarding this, the present study aimed to determine the relationship between the dominant hand and intelligence in the 4-16 year-old children undergoing cochlear implantation in the left or right ear. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on the records of the patients aged within 4-16 years who had undergone cochlear implantation during 20082011. The subjects’ IQ was measured using Wechsler test by a neuroscience specialist. Then, the IQ of the children with the right cochlear implant was compared to that of those with left implant. The data were analyzed using the ttest, Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test in SPSS version 18. Results: According to the results, there was no significant difference between the children with right and left cochlear implants in terms of the mean IQ score (P=0.54). Furthermore, no significant association was observed between IQ score and right-handedness or left-handedness in the children undergoing cochlear implantation (P=0.17, P=0.8, respectively). Comparison of IQ between 4-16 year-old children after … 60 Conclusion: As the findings indicated, there was no relationship between the dominant hand and IQ score in the children undergoing cochlear implantation.

Key words: Brain hemisphere, Cochlear implantation, IQ, Predominant hand

References

1. Baldassari CM, Schmidt C, Schubert CM, Srinivasan P, Dodson KM, Sismanis A (2009). Receptive language outcomes in children after cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(1):114-9.

2. Hashemi SB, Monshizadeh L (2012). The effect of cochlear implantation in development of intelligence quotient of 6–9 deaf children in comparison with normal hearing children (Iran, 2009–2011). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(6):802-4.

3. Peng S-C, Tomblin JB, Turner CW (2008). Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing. Ear Hearing 29(3):336-51.

4. Sandford J, Turner A (2002). Integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test manual. Richmond, VA: BrainTrain.

5. Brown C, McDowall DW (1999). Speech production results in children implanted with the Clarion® implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108(4_suppl):110-2.

6. Harrison RV, Gordon KA, Mount RJ (2005). Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Dev Psychobiol 46(3):252-61.

7. Elsevier S (2009). International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. Gapan: 1995-Present.

8. Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT (2000). Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci 11(2):153-8.

9. Wu CM, Lee HL, Hwang JH, Sun YS, Liu TC (2008). Intellectual ability of Mandarin-speaking children using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol ;13(5):302-8.

10. Fagan MK, Pisoni DB, Horn DL, Dillon CM (2007). Neuropsychological correlates of vocabulary, reading, and working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 12(4):461-71.

11. Jensen JH, Børre S, Johansen PA (1989). Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in children: cognitive abilities with respect to right/left ear differences. Br J Audiol 23(3):215-20.

12. Niedzielski A, Humeniuk E, Błaziak P, Gwizda G (2006). Intellectual efficiency of children with unilateral hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70(9):1529-32.

13. Henkin Y, Swead RT, Roth DAE, KishonRabin L, Shapira Y, Migirov

L, et al (2014). Evidence for a right cochlear implant advantage in simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 124(8):193741.

14. Mohammed AA, Sarwat SA (2014). The side of cochlear implantation and speech intelligibility in pediatric and adult cochlear implantees. Egyp J Otolaryngol 30(4):362.

15. Oyler RF, Oyler AL, Matkin ND (1988). Unilateral hearing loss: demographics and educational impact. Language Speech Hearing Serv Sch 19(2):201-10.

16. Kilenyº PR (2004). Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) in children with cochlear implants: a preliminary report. Int J Audiol 43:S48-S51.

17. 1Eggermont JJ, Ponton CW, Don M, Waring MD, Kwong B (1997). Maturational delays in cortical evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. Acta Oto-laryngol 117(2):161-3.

18. Wechsler D (20019). Wechsler Test of Adult Reading: WTAR: Psychological Corporation.

19. Sharifi A, Kakojoibari AA, Sarmadi MR (2010). Comparison of different levels of reading comprehension between hearing-impaired and normalhearing students (2010). Bim Audiol Tehran Univ Med Sci 19(2):25-32.

20. Warren DM, Stern M, Duggirala R, Dyer TD, Almasy L (2006). Heritability and linkage analysis of hand, foot, and eye preference in Mexican Americans. Laterality 11(6):508-24.

21. Crow T (2010). A theory of the origin of cerebral asymmetry: epigenetic variation superimposed on a fixed right-shift. Laterality 15(3):289-303.

22. Johnston DW, Nicholls ME, Shah M, Shields MA (2009). Nature’s experiment? Handedness and early childhood development. Demography 46(2):281-301.

23. 2Llaurens V, Raymond M, Faurie C (2009). Why are some people lefthanded? An evolutionary perspective. Philosoph Transact Royal Soci London B Biol Sci 364(1519):881-94.

24. Medland SE, Duffy DL, Wright MJ, Geffen GM, Hay DA, Levy F, et al (2009). Genetic influences on handedness: data from 25,732 Australian and Dutch twin families. Neuropsychologia 47(2):330-7.

25. Mahram M, Karimi F (2013). Correlation of handedness and gender with the results of intelligence test and school readiness assessment in children.

26. Kastner-Koller U, Deimann P, Bruckner J (2007). Assessing handedness in pre-schoolers: Construction and initial validation of a hand preference test for 4-6-year-olds. Psychol Sci 49(3):239.

27. Denny K, O’Sullivan V (2007). The economic consequences of being left-handed some sinister results. J Hum Resourc 42(2):353-74.

28. Faurie C, Bonenfant S, Goldberg M, Hercberg S, Zins M, Raymond M (2008). Socioeconomic status and handedness in two large cohorts of French adults. Br J Psychol 99(4):533-54.

29. Faurie C, Llaurens V, Hegay T, Raymond M (2012). Handedness and socioeconomic status in an urban population in Uzbekistan. Evol Hum Behav 33(1):35-41.

30. Ruebeck CS, Harrington Jr JE, Moffitt R (2007). Handedness and earnings. Laterality 12(2):101-20.

31. Fisher JR (2006). Psychosocial differences between left-handed and righthanded children.

32. Corballis MC, Hattie J, Fletcher R (2008). Handedness and intellectual achievement: an even-handed look. Neuropsychologia 46(1):374-8.

33. Peters M, Reimers S, Manning JT (2006). Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255,100 subjects: the BBC internet study. Brain Cognition 62(2):177-89.

34. Ghayas S, Adil A (2007). Effect of handedness on intelligence level of students. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol 33(1):85-91.

35. Weiss RP (2000). Brain based learning. Train Dev 54(7):21-.

36. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW (2005). Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 115(5):796-802.

37. Witelson S, Beresh H, Kigar D (2005). Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization and age factors. Brain 129(2):38698.

38. Alibeik H, Angaji S, Pouriamanesh S, Movallali G (2011). The correlation between left-sidedness and intelligence as an advantage for persistence of left-handed frequency in human evolutionary pathway. Austral J Basic Appl Scie 5(6):1517-24. 39. Hlustık ́ P, Solodkin A, Gullapalli RP, Noll DC, Small SL (2002). Functional lateralization of the human premotor cortex during sequential movements. Brain Cognition 49(1):54-62.

40. Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Noll D, Small S (2001). Lateralization of motor circuits and handedness during finger movements. Eur J Neurol 8(5):42534.

41. Gordon KA, Deighton MR, Abbasalipour P, Papsin BC (2014). Perception of binaural cues develops in children who are deaf through bilateral cochlear implantation. PLoS One 9(12):e114841.

42. Gordon KA, Jiwani S, Papsin BC (2013). Benefits and detriments of unilateral cochlear implant use on bilateral auditory development in children who are deaf. Front Psychol 2013:4.




Download article


Download 15672147755.pdf (Size: 323.44 KB)